[ad_1]
A Hong Kong radio station that has aired pro-democracy shows without a licence for nearly 18 years held its last broadcast on Friday, citing difficulties operating in a “dangerous” political landscape.
Founded by veteran activist Tsang Kin-shing in 2005, Citizens’ Radio began as an act of civil disobedience against Hong Kong’s public broadcasting laws, which he and fellow activists criticised as overly restrictive of public access to the airwaves.
In its early years, the station aired phone-in talk shows where prominent opposition figures sometimes appeared as guests, tapping into a culture of spirited political commentary.
But Tsang, nicknamed Bull, said Friday that Citizens’ Radio had had trouble inviting guests in light of Beijing’s tightening grip.
“Hong Kong’s political situation today has fallen off a cliff,” Tsang, 67, told reporters before the final show, recorded in a cluttered studio within an industrial building.
“If we invite guests, they may not be able to speak freely, because there are so many red lines.”
Tsang added that the station could not pay rent beyond August after its bank account was blocked from receiving donations.
After massive pro-democracy protests in Hong Kong in 2019, Beijing imposed a national security law that critics say has silenced dissent and curtailed political freedoms.
More than 250 people — including activists, lawmakers and journalists — have been arrested under the security law and three major pro-democracy media outlets have shuttered under pressure.
“I believe in the future, in Hong Kong, it will be hard to have this kind of civil disobedience again,” Tsang said of his radio station.
– Civil disobedience –
While Citizens’ Radio has not been targeted under the security law, its open defiance of Hong Kong’s broadcasting rules meant it had been embroiled in government lawsuits for years.
After their broadcasting licence application was denied, the station set up its own FM transmitters atop the city’s famous Lion Rock mountain.
Tsang estimated he and others paid HK$60,000 ($7,700) in fines over the years, and the station had its studio raided and its equipment confiscated by officials more than once.
“I believe the airwaves are a public resource, and should not just belong to the commercial sector or the government,” he said on Friday.
But Tsang’s attempts to challenge Hong Kong’s broadcasting regulations hit a dead-end after his case was dismissed by the top court in 2017.
Emily Lau, former chair of Hong Kong’s Democratic Party and occasional guest on Citizens’ Radio, said the station contributed to a once-vibrant media scene.
“(The closure) is another reminder that Hong Kong people are really losing many of the things that we used to have,” Lau told AFP.
“Now in Hong Kong, you have to look very hard to find channels where people can express their views freely.”
Despite its high-profile legal battles, Citizens’ Radio has been described as a fringe outlet and the size of its audience remained unclear.
Tsang said every day of broadcasting was “an act of resistance”, regardless of audience numbers.
Hong Kong’s Office of the Communications Authority declined to comment on the station’s shutdown, except to say that the station runs only on the internet.
Tsang on Friday gathered some of the station’s hosts for a final hour of laughs and commiseration, and together they bowed to thank their supporters.
“We thank the Hong Kong public, who are clear-eyed and clear-headed,” Tsang said.
“Eighteen years is not a short time.”
[ad_2]
Source link
On every issue we examined, a majority of those who reported mainly watching Fox News or Newsmax said they recalled hearing about the various news stories we polled, while never more than 50 percent of those who watched CNN and MSNBC had the same information. Depending on the issue, the gap between the two groups averaged 23.5 percent, a huge deficit in the factual information of viewers of liberal cable news.
■ Economic Woes: A majority of respondents (56%) recalled hearing that gas prices had risen 52 percent since President Biden took office. But that number drops to less than half (48%) among those who say they watch CNN and MSNBC most often; among those who watch Fox News or Newsmax most, nearly three-in-four (73%) recalled hearing that news.
■ Biden’s Border Disaster: A majority of voters (54%) recalled hearing that there had been an average of 2.3 million illegal border crossings each year since Biden took office, a record. But a far higher percentage of Fox News and Newsmax viewers (77%) remembered this news story, vs. just 38 percent of CNN and MSNBC viewers.
■ Durham Report: Last month’s report by Special Counsel John Durham determined that the FBI and the Justice Department did not have “any actual evidence of collusion” when they began investigating Donald Trump’s 2016 presidential campaign. The “Russian collusion” story was a media obsession for more than two years, but our poll found only 52 percent of voters remember hearing news about Durham’s final report.
■ Tampering with the Hunter Biden probe: It was April when an FBI whistleblower first told Congress that he had information that the President’s son had benefitted from “preferential treatment” in the multi-year investigation into tax fraud (the same charges which has now led to Hunter Biden’s guilty plea). Within a couple of weeks, the whistleblower’s lawyer reported that his client as well as the entire team had been removed from the investigation.
■ Biden Family Corruption: Last month, a major report from the House Oversight Committee showed that “Biden family business members and business associates created a web of over 20 companies” and, according to bank records, “the Biden family, their business associates, and their companies received over $10 million from foreign nationals’ companies,” including when Joe Biden was Vice President.
■ FBI withholding bribery evidence against Joe Biden: In May, House and Senate investigators asked for an unclassified document containing allegations that Joe Biden had accepted a bribe as Vice President. Even when faced with a lawful subpoena, the FBI refused to turn over this document to Congress, although the Bureau eventually permitted select members of the House Oversight Committee to view the document.
